Intel’s $3.4 Trillion “Blunder” Actually Saved AI…

“What if?”

What if Benjamin Franklin never experimented with a kite?

What if the United States never imposed an oil embargo on Japan in August 1941?

What if President Dwight Eisenhower never sent military support to Vietnam in 1955?

Questions like this can be associated with just about every major event in history.

Armchair quarterbacking has become an American pastime, from second-guessing the political establishment to questioning the decisions of our favorite sports team’s coaching staff.

We do it all the time.

We fixate on how one simple change can drastically change the course of history.

And that’s precisely what happened 20 years ago, when a singular boardroom decision forever altered the trajectory of one of the most significant technological advances in human history.

Let me explain…

A Radical Idea Falls Flat

In 2005, the CEO of one of America’s largest companies had an idea.

At the time, Intel Inc. (Nasdaq: INTC) was the dominant force in developing the chips that were the electronic brains of most computers.

A few Intel directors had their eye on a small Silicon Valley upstart developing graphics processing chips that could potentially create new jobs in data centers, the massive facilities that now power the artificial intelligence (AI) mega trend.

Intel CEO Paul Otellini liked the idea and approached the company’s board with a proposal to buy Nvidia Corp. (Nasdaq: NVDA).

However, Intel’s board had issues.

The company didn’t have a good track record of absorbing other companies. Plus, the price tag — as much as $20 billion — was more than Intel had ever spent on an acquisition … let alone on an upstart company with not much of a track record.

The board dismissed the idea out of hand.

Otellini backed off the takeover, leaving it dead in the water.

The rest, as they say, is history.

Despite its dominant market share, Intel has struggled to innovate and maintain relevance amid a changing tech landscape.

Meanwhile, Nvidia has soared from a buyout price of $20 billion to a total market capitalization of $3.4 trillion. A tidy 16,900% gain for anyone keeping score.

Which leads us back to today’s tempting question…

What if Intel actually bought Nvidia in 2005?

The AI Revolution May Not Have Happened

As Adam O’Dell pointed out recently, Intel has a history of struggling to innovate beyond its core vision.

Back in the 90s, Intel was the gem of the tech world.

The company maintained its dominance in the market but never really innovated past that.

Here’s an example:

In 2011, Intel spent $1.4 billion to purchase Infineon’s wireless solutions division to create the Intel Mobile Communications division.

The division was aimed to research and develop mobile technology.

While the division created 2G, 3G, 4G and 5G internet modems, those products never dented market share.

In 2019, Apple Inc. (Nasdaq: AAPL) entered into a $1 billion agreement with Intel to buy the Intel Mobile Communications Division, thus ending Intel’s foray into the mobile market.

What if Intel had bought Nvidia? We can deduce a few things:

  1. Intel buys Nvidia for $20 billion and continues making the same graphics chips for data centers.
  2. Intel never fully expands the development of those chips, and the venture starts to lose money as demand for those chips stalls.
  3. The Intel board realizes it’ll never make back its initial $20 billion investment and sells its graphic chips business to Qualcomm for less than it paid.
  4. The development of the chips needed to compute large language models used in AI is delayed 10 to 15 years.

Fast forward to today, and instead of being two years into this incredible AI mega trend after ChatGPT’s launch, mass market large language models are still years away — along with every investing opportunity they’ve presented since 2022.

Imagine if Intel had killed the AI revolution 20 years before it began. If it had gone through with the purchase, Nvidia may not have ever fully innovated its AI graphic chips under Intel’s guidance.

Adam called the decision not to buy Nvidia Intel’s “single worst blunder in the history of the company.”

That is true, but it also kept the AI revolution timeline intact.

Until next time…

Safe trading,

Matt Clark

Matt Clark, CMSA®

Chief Research Analyst, Money & Markets

Warning Signs Flash for Intel as Stock Rates ZERO

I’ll admit, this is a bit geeky…

But the greatest thrill in the life of a systematic investor comes when you least expect it — when one of your own systems surprises even you.

Because let’s face it, that’s the whole point of all the hard work.

With Green Zone Power Ratings, we’re building a system that can process more data, project more accurately, and come to more balanced conclusions than any individual investor ever could.

If that means the results are surprising? Then so be it.

And right now, my ratings system offers no greater surprise than Intel (Nasdaq: INTC). Titan of the semiconductor world, with 78% market share in the PC world … Intel scores a big, fat, ZERO:

I’ll admit — such a low score for such a dominant tech company surprises even me. And I couldn’t be happier about it!

After all, my Green Zone Power Ratings system isn’t designed around companies. It’s designed around the investor. And time after time, we keep finding that the ‘best’ companies in the world just aren’t the best investments for folks like you and me.

So the score above reflects the company as an investment. It tells you how shares of INTC are likely to perform, and whether you should be buying them.

Obviously, you shouldn’t.

But in Intel’s case, we should zoom out to take a look at the bigger picture with INTC … and see whether share prices are headed as low as the stock’s rating…

Intel’s Tragic Dominance

I really cannot stress enough how Intel was practically the “Golden Boy” of the first big computer boom.

Intel’s founders were a group of defectors from Fairchild Semiconductor — including none other than Gordon Moore, father of “Moore’s Law.” These men were visionaries who could see the future of computing, decades in advance.

Intel delivered the world’s first commercial microprocessor back in 1971, developed a lasting partnership with IBM, and became a shoo-in to dominate early personal computing in the 1990s.

Intel had it all. For decades, they maintained a dominant market share across most sectors.

But at the same time, Intel has never really innovated beyond that core vision of producing cutting-edge CPUs.

Indeed, this is something my Green Zone Power Rating System identified with Intel very early on. INTC’s rating first fell out of bullish territory all the way back in 1999, dropping to 59 out of 100.

Intel’s share price soon followed suit, sinking 83% from Sept. 2000 to Sept 2002.

After the dotcom-era crash, Intel made multiple forays into mobile devices — each time delivering unimpressive results.

After spending $10 billion on a new mobile division back in 2020, Intel ultimately sold its 5G business off to Apple.

More recently, Intel completely missed the bus on artificial intelligence (AI). Despite the company’s unequivocal dominance in the CPU space, it never became a member of the “Magnificent Seven,” and instead INTC’s shares sank 43% over the last year.

Finally, we come to what is arguably the greatest financial disaster in Intel’s long and storied history…

Back in 2005, Intel CEO Paul Otellini pushed the company to buy an upstart competitor named Nvidia (Nasdaq: NVDA) for $20 billion.

At the time Nvidia was still primarily manufacturing graphics cards (GPUs) for video gamers.

And for some reason, the greatest CPU innovator in history didn’t seem to see the value in buying up Nvidia for $20 billion.

It’s one of the great “What If” moments in modern technology.

Because over the last 19 years, Nvidia’s value has shot up from $20 billion to more than $3.36 trillion.

You could argue that Intel’s failure to follow-through on an Nvidia acquisition is the single worst blunder in the company’s history.

But once again, we’re investing in the stock, not just the company.

So just a few years later in 2009, Intel’s rating once again turned bullish — and shares rallied a staggering 475% over the next decade!

A Tale of Two Intels

As you can see, there’s a vast difference between the Intel you read about in the headlines … and the way Intel’s shares perform inside your stock portfolio…

At any given time, mainstream financial media might be heaping praise on Intel’s newest generation of cutting-edge chips. Meanwhile, INTC’s shares are plunging.

This disconnect comes up more often than you might realize. And it can cost unwary investors a fortune.

That’s the whole reason I created my Green Zone Power Rating system in the first place, to help you cut through the hype and discern whether a given stock is actually worth your time and investment.

And right now, Intel is showing our lowest possible rating at 0 out of 100. That’s as clear an indication as we could possibly get to steer clear of INTC.

Headed into 2025, we’re going to keep a close eye on Intel here in Money & Markets Daily.

Partly due to our own morbid curiosity, but also because the company’s rock-bottom score seems to indicate a potential disaster ahead for at least one major tech giant…

To good profits,

Adam O’Dell

Chief Investment Strategist,

Money & Markets

IFF Stock Price and the Flavor Industry

The global flavor and fragrance industry is an essential, albeit often overlooked, sector powering a multitude of consumer goods industries. All of the new NA seltzer and beer flavors, all the flavor trends and tik tok recipes, ice cream and confections and even down to viral hits like the Pumpkin Spice latte – all are from a centralized flavor company!

International Flavors & Fragrances (NYSE: IFF) stands as a juggernaut in this domain, producing flavors, fragrances, and specialty ingredients that are integral to food, beverages, personal care, and household products. Investors tracking IFF’s stock price and the broader flavor company stocks have reasons to be intrigued, flavor isn’t going anywhere. Sure, trends change, but these flavor suppliers are on the forefront of flavor innovation.

Why the Flavor Industry Matters

Flavor companies like IFF, Givaudan, Brookside and Symrise are at the heart of innovation in food and beverages. They help brands deliver taste and scent experiences that drive customer loyalty. As consumers demand healthier, sustainable, and more innovative products, the flavor industry is responding with advancements in natural ingredients, plant-based solutions, and clean-label products.

The global flavor and fragrance market is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 4.9% from 2023 to 2030, driven by emerging markets, increasing health awareness, and the rising demand for processed foods. This steady growth trajectory positions flavor companies as attractive investment options.

IFF: A Leader in the Pack

Recent Stock Performance

As of late 2024, IFF’s stock price has seen mixed performance, influenced by broader market trends, raw material costs, and integration challenges following its 2021 merger with DuPont’s Nutrition & Biosciences unit. However, analysts often view dips in IFF’s stock price as potential buying opportunities, considering its strong fundamentals and diversified portfolio.

Key Growth Drivers

  1. Innovation in Plant-Based and Natural Flavors: IFF is leading the way in creating sustainable, natural solutions to meet consumer preferences.
  2. Global Expansion: IFF’s presence in emerging markets, especially in Asia-Pacific and Latin America, provides access to high-growth regions.
  3. Partnerships and M&A: IFF’s merger with DuPont’s Nutrition & Biosciences expanded its product offerings and market reach.

The Competitive Landscape

While IFF is a leader, it isn’t the only player in the game. Let’s compare some of the top flavor companies:

  • Givaudan: Based in Switzerland, Givaudan is the largest flavor company globally, with a focus on luxury fragrances and health-oriented flavors.
  • Symrise: A German competitor with a strong presence in natural and organic flavors.
  • Takasago International: A Japanese flavor house specializing in Asian-inspired taste solutions.

Each of these companies has unique strengths, but IFF’s scale, R&D investments, and diversified portfolio make it a standout for investors seeking exposure to this industry.

Investing in Flavor Stocks: What to Watch

1. Market Trends

The health and wellness trend is driving demand for natural and plant-based flavors, creating opportunities for companies like IFF.

2. Commodity Prices

Raw materials like citrus oils and vanilla can be volatile. Investors should watch for fluctuations in commodity prices and their impact on margins.

3. Innovation and Sustainability

Flavor companies are under pressure to innovate and align with ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) standards. IFF has made strides in sustainability, which can be a competitive edge. Things like meat substitutes and gluten free breads. Food items that taste like the OG but are much healthier or cater to dietary restrictions.

4. Earnings and Guidance

Review quarterly earnings for insights into revenue growth, margin expansion, and integration of recent acquisitions.

Conclusion

Investing in flavor company stocks like IFF offers a unique way to tap into the consumer goods sector’s backbone. With steady demand, innovation in health-oriented products, and a growing market in emerging economies, these stocks can add flavor to any portfolio.

However, investors should keep an eye on market trends and company fundamentals before taking a bite. The trump tarrifs and economy uncertainty could lead to greater pain before IFF and others rebound.

The post IFF Stock Price and the Flavor Industry appeared first on Investment U.

SCHD: Should You Buy Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF?

If you’re looking for a high-quality dividend ETF then there’s a good chance that you’ve come across the Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (Nysearca: SCHD) before. This ETF is highly regarded by investors. So much so that CNBC and Morningstar have called it the gold standard for dividend funds. Is this ETF a must-have for your dividend portfolio? Or, are there better options out there?

What’s an ETF?

As a quick reminder, an exchange-traded fund (ETF) is a financial product that tracks an underlying index, sector, or asset class. If a stock were a fruit then buying an ETF is a bit like buying a fruit basket, you get many small pieces from lots of different fruits.

Many investors prefer buying ETFs because they help you easily diversify your portfolio. Buying shares of an ETF essentially means you never have to worry about picking the right stocks.

For example, let’s say that you’re bullish on the future of AI. But, you aren’t sure which company(s) will emerge as leaders in AI over the coming years and you don’t want to risk investing in the wrong companies. In this case, you could simply invest in an ETF that tracks a range of AI stocks instead of trying to handpick certain companies.

You can read more about how ETF investing works here. Now, let’s discuss Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD).

What is SCHD?

The Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF is a passive ETF whose goal is to “track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100™ Index.” This means that SCHD tracks the top 100 biggest, most reliable dividend-paying companies in America.

Buying shares in this fund is a low-cost and tax-efficient way for investors to get access to some of the most financially stable companies that pay consistent, reliable dividends. If you buy shares in SCHD then you won’t have to worry about researching individual dividend stocks. 

Additionally, an expense ratio of 0.06% means you will only pay $0.60 in fees for every $1,000 that you invest. This is much lower than many actively managed funds. But, still not as cheap as doing your own research.

The SCHD focuses on the quality and sustainability of dividends, mainly looking for companies that increase their dividends over time. Its five biggest holdings are:

  1. Cisco Systems (Nasdaq: CSCO) which makes up 4.12% of the index
  2. AbbVie (NYSE: ABBV) which makes up 4.11% of the index
  3. Home Depot (NYSE: HD) which makes up 4.06% of the index
  4. Amgen (Nasdaq: AMGN) which makes up 4.04% of the index
  5. Chevron (NYSE: CVX) which makes up 4.04% of the index

This stock-based index is most concentrated in the following five industries:

  1. Financials which makes up 17.42% of the index 
  2. Healthcare which makes up 15.71% of the index 
  3. Consumer Staples which makes up 13.89% of the index 
  4. Industrials which makes up 13.51% of the index 
  5. Energy which makes up 12.84% of the index 

Should You Buy SCHD?

This depends on your investment strategy and goals. However, if you’re an investor looking to get exposure to a wide range of high-quality dividend stocks then SCHD certainly presents a good solution. This fund has a long and proven history of consistently increasing its dividend payout. 

Here’s a quick snapshot of its dividend payments over the past few years (it pays dividends quarterly):

  • Q1 2024: $0.8241 per share
  • Q1 2023: $0.5965 per share
  • Q1 2022: $0.5176 per share
  • Q1 2021: $0.5026 per share
  • Q1 2020: $0.4419 per share

You can see that the fund has consistently increased its dividend payments over the years. However, there were a few quarters where dividend payments dipped (mainly, in the wake of the 2020 pandemic). 

Since 2020, SCHD’s stock price has also increased by roughly 34%. This shows the year-over-year dividend and stock appreciation growth that you can expect to experience from this fund. But, remember that past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

That said, a dividend ETF like SCHD might not be the best choice for investors with a longer time horizon. If you plan to keep your money invested for a longer period of time (say, 10 years or more) then you might be better off sticking with a regular ETF. 

Dividend ETFs Vs Stock Market ETFs

Dividend ETFs are popular for their ability to reliably pay money to investors via dividends. Some investors rely on these dividends for income. But, many investors choose to reinvest the dividends back into the fund. If your goal is long-term capital appreciation then you might be better off going with a general stock market ETF.

Stock market ETFs can often outperform dividend ETFs. For example, consider an ETF like the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (Nysearca: SPY) which tracks the overall performance of the S&P 500. Or, the Fidelity NASDAQ Composite Index ETF (Nasdaq: ONEQ) which tracks tech-centric NASDAQ index. Here’s how these two ETFs have fared against the SCHD since 2020:

  • SCHD: 34%
  • SPY: 70%
  • ONEQ: 101%

Dividend ETFs are great because they reliably pay dividends. But, they also tend to track later-stage companies whose high-growth periods are behind them. This means that they could miss out on sector-specific rallies – such as the recent artificial intelligence rally. This is why dividend ETFs can often underperform the broader market, in terms of stock price appreciation. However, keep in mind that the above returns do not factor in reinvested dividends, so it’s not entirely an apples-to-apples comparison.

Ultimately, SCHD is a great choice for investors who are looking for an ETF that reliably pays increasingly growing dividends. But, it might not be the best idea for investors who prioritize stock price appreciation and have a longer time horizon.

You can learn more about ETF investing here:

  1. 5 Monthly Dividend ETFs for Income Portfolios 
  2. ETFs That Short the Market
  3. ETFs: Pros and Cons

I hope that you’ve found this article valuable when it comes to learning about SCHD and whether or not you should buy it. If you’re interested in learning more then please subscribe below to get alerted of new investment opportunities from InvestmentU.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational and educational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial advice as the author, Ted Stavetski, is not a financial advisor. Ted also did not own shares of SCHD at the time of writing.

The post SCHD: Should You Buy Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF? appeared first on Investment U.

Getting in on the Gene-Editing Wave: Should You Buy CRSP Stock?

Investors who witnessed Moderna’s (Nasdaq: MRNA) meteoric rise during the pandemic know just how profitable new biotechnology companies can be. As a pioneer in gene-editing medicines, CRISPR Therapeutics (Nasdaq: CRSP) could be another up-and-coming biotech stock that you want to keep your eye on.

In December 2023, CRISPR received approval from the FDA to treat sickle cell disease (SCD) and beta-thalassemia with its landmark drug, CASGEVY. However, despite this breakthrough, CRSP stock is down 15% in 2024. 

CRISPR’s Breakthrough Treatment

To start, investors should be careful buying CRSP stock as its success depends almost entirely on CASGEVY over the short term. CRISPR currently has 5 other drugs in clinical programs. But, CASGEVY is its only FDA-approved therapy. For investors, this means that CRISPR’s price will likely be very volatile in the short term. Any good news around CASGEVY will likely send the stock soaring, while bad news could do the opposite.

Despite its limited portfolio of approved drugs, CRISPR’s future seems very strong. Its approved drug, CASGEVY, is a potential cure for sickle cell, a debilitating and life-threatening disease. The company also has 15 more drugs in its pipeline including therapies for hemoglobinopathies, oncology, and regenerative medicine.

Additionally, the company is led (and co-founded) by Emmanuelle Charpentier. Emmanuelle received the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for her work on the CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing system. This just goes to show how cutting-edge CRISPR’s treatments are.

We also can’t discuss CRSP stock without also talking about Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: VRTX). 

CRISPR and Vertex Pharmaceuticals (Nasdaq: VRTX)

Vertex Pharmaceuticals owns 60% of CRISPR’s gene editing therapy for CASGEVY.

Right now, CASGEVY is in a bit of an exploratory phase. It has been approved by the FDA for use in the United States and the United Kingdom. In the US FDA trial, the drug was administered to 31 patients with 93.5% experiencing no major ill side effects. Now, it’s on doctors across the US and UK to recommend this treatment to their patients. When that happens, Vertex will own 60% of all sales and CRISPR will receive 40%.

On one hand, this will undoubtedly take a bite out of CRISPR’s potential profits. However, Vertex and CRISPR plan to charge $2.2 million for CASGEVY treatments. CRISPR’s cut of any prescribed treatments would presumably be 40% of $2.2 million or $880,000 per treatment – still incredibly high for one product.

Additionally, from what I’ve read, Vertex has significantly better commercialization abilities than CRISPR. It’s a bigger company with a much wider influence which will help bring CASGEVY to market and make it more readily available for patients. So, this partnership may actually work out in CRISPR’s favor.

Crispr Technologies Most Recent Quarter

As a cutting-edge biotech company, Crispr Technologies’ income has been all over the place over the last three years.

  1. 2023: Annual revenue of $371.2 million and a net loss of $153 million
  2. 2022: Annual revenue of $1.2 million and net loss of $650 million
  3. 2021: Annual revenue of $914.9 million a net income of $377 million

This type of variability is not uncommon for early-stage biotech companies. These types of companies often spend years churning through investors’ money while they work to develop cures. However, once they’ve developed a viable treatment, revenue and income can go parabolic. Could this be what’s in store for CRSP stock?

Should You Buy CRSP Stock?

Buying early-stage biotech companies is a bit of a gamble.

On one hand, CRSP stock certainly seems poised for a breakout. The company received critical approval for a life-changing drug and yet the stock is down YTD. The company also has a Nobel Prize-winning CEO in charge, which is a great sign of things to come. Crispr Technologies has the potential to do amazing things in the medicinal field over the coming years. If its gene-editing treatments are successful then the stock will undoubtedly soar.

Red Flags to consider. 

For example, how many people will actually buy CASGEVY? According to the FDA, sickle cell impacts just 100,000 people in the US, or 0.0003% of the population. And, for those who have sickle cell, how many will be able to actually afford CASGEVY given its immense price tag of $2.2 million dollars? These questions are difficult to estimate, especially given the US healthcare system’s convoluted use of insurance policies to pay for treatments.

Finally, it’s worth mentioning that CRISPR already trades at a valuation of $4.75 billion. Some could argue that the company is immensely overvalued, considering its reported revenue of just $504,000 last quarter. On top of that, sickle cell affects a small portion of the US population. An even smaller percentage of those impacted will actually be able to afford CASGEVY. Finally, when CASGEVY revenue starts coming in, CRISPR will only receive 40%.

CASGEVY approval could be a sign of positive things to come.

It’s important to remember that CASGEVY is just one treatment for a handful of diseases. But, CASGEVY is also based on cutting-edge gene-editing technology. If CRISPR can use its gene-editing therapies to treat more common diseases – cancer, heart disease, etc – then the company’s $4.75 billion valuation might seem incredibly cheap. Who knows how long this type of diversification might take. But, it’s a very positive sign that CRSP stock has upward potential over the long run.

If you’re interested in buying CRSP stock, it might be wise to consider doing so slowly over time. This can help protect you from dramatic swings in the stock’s price. 

I hope that you’ve found this article valuable when it comes to learning about CRSP stock. If you’re interested in learning about other gene editing stocks click here, or please subscribe below to get alerted of new investment opportunities from InvestmentU.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational and educational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial advice as the author, Ted Stavetski, is not a financial advisor. Ted also did not own CRSP stock at the time of writing.

The post Getting in on the Gene-Editing Wave: Should You Buy CRSP Stock? appeared first on Investment U.

Making an Informed Solana Crypto Price Prediction

When we first started writing about Solana, it is was trading for around $3.50 a token (it’s currently at $165). At that time, making a Solana crypto price prediction didn’t make sense yet. After all, it was pretty new back then. But still, we liked what we saw. The foundational blockchain behind Solana crypto looked strong then. And it looks even stronger now.

At the time, Solana was still very much a speculative investment. But speculators who took the chance have seen a huge increase in value of Solana crypto. And this comes despite a drop-off at the end of 2021 and bear market through ’22 and ’23. However, the next several months or so could be just as interesting.

Company's logo to accompany this Solana crypto price prediction

What caught our attention was the three-point plan to revolutionize the way crypto transactions work. At the time, there were a swath of “to-the-moon” rug pulls and scam coins that seemed to be getting released every week. In fact, some estimates suggest that DeFi (decentralized finance) rug pulls and exit scams make up 99% of all fraud in the crypto markets.

But Solana crypto came to the table with a plan. It didn’t just promise to reward investors. The company started making good on its plan. It also happens to be rewarding investors in the process. That’s why we’re so bullish on this relatively new crypto. And we’re not the only ones. Trading volume has been way up on Solana crypto since it skied to upwards of $250 in the fall of 2021.

Naturally, as exposure grows, there will be ups and downs in line with the greater crypto markets. But it’s a lot easier to make an educated guess about a Solana crypto price prediction now… since it appears it’s just starting to warm up.

Succeeding Where Others Fall Short

Solana crypto’s founder famously published a white paper draft that laid out a new timekeeping technique called Proof of History (PoH). This proposal was developed to fix one of the major limitations cryptos like Bitcoin and Ethereum faced in terms of scalability. You see, the time that’s required to reach a consensus on transactions was largely seen as a major drawback. But PoH was a way to automate that whole process… And it could act as a crucial element that would allow crypto networks to scale beyond their previous capabilities.

The white paper generated a lot of attention. It wasn’t long before Solana Labs formed. And it began recruiting engineers from the likes of Qualcomm (Nasdaq: QCOM) and Apple (Nasdaq: AAPL). Within a couple of years, the team had raised $20 million to fund its new crypto network. And less than a year later, Solana crypto was launched.

In the process, the core team behind Solana has proven the success of the PoH model. The records (or “blocks”) for most cryptos are limited in size and frequency. And that can dramatically slow down transaction times. The PoH model fixes this problem. But the Solana network also uses a Proof of Stake consensus algorithm, which helps keep the network secure.

Solana crypto is also currently exploring ways to reduce transaction fees. When these fees were first introduced, they were a means to keep bad actors from overloading crypto networks. But the speed of the PoH model largely reduces this problem. That makes it cheaper to transfer coins from one wallet to another.

And lastly, Solana crypto excels at avoiding confirmation delays… This just means it won’t take as long for deposits to be processed. In fact, Solana has proven to be able to process 50,000 transactions per second, with a transaction fee of just $0.00001. Not too shabby compared to other tokens.

A Solana Crypto Price Prediction: Why It Still Has Plenty of Upside

Despite the wild moves in value and the technical breakthroughs, it’s important to keep in mind one important detail: The Solana crypto network is no longer in its beta stage. Investors now have access to staking rewards – which seems to be the norm these days. But that’s why a Solana crypto price prediction is so hard to pin down.

The upgrade is now live, and it’s anybody’s guess as to how high Solana crypto can go. But it’s certainly not out of the question that it could reach a triple-digit valuation by the end of the year… especially if it stays on its current production timetable and volatility dies down.

Solana has already shaken up the crypto community. And now that more investors are sitting up and taking note, we’ve got a pretty good feeling that Solana’s future is bright. It set out to revolutionize the way crypto transactions take place. We’re seeing it do that in real time now. In the process, it’s making a whole lot of people’s crypto wallets feel a little bulkier these days, with even more to come.

Even now in 2024, it still has tremendous upside. It hasn’t kept up with the surge in bitcoin, it still follows all of the same fundamentals that make it strong, and it could potentially be in line for the next crypto ETF.

The Bottom Line on the Solana Crypto Price Prediction

Part of what makes the crypto markets so fascinating is that they’re driven by innovation. Another part is that they’re knocked back down by headlines. Crypto expert Andy Snyder has long described crypto as the very definition of a headline-driven market. And it’s true. A tweet from the right person can send the value of a token skyward in a moment’s notice. But Solana isn’t some meme-based token. It’s built on a solid foundation. Don’t expect to see a TITAN-type situation here.

This makes a Solana crypto price prediction a lot easier to make. We don’t expect to see Elon Musk or Mark Cuban making statements about it. But we do expect Solana crypto and the network it’s built on to continue down its path of innovation. So as long as the crypto markets stay relatively healthy, Solana should continue its upward trajectory well past the $100 mark. And in a matter of a few years, if it does indeed become one of the standard cryptos – as we think it could – it should be worth a whole lot more than that.

The post Making an Informed Solana Crypto Price Prediction appeared first on Investment U.

Understanding the Puts vs Calls Ratio: A Key Indicator for Market Sentiment

In the dynamic world of trading, the “puts vs calls ratio” stands out as a crucial analytical tool used by investors to gauge market sentiment and potential directional movements in market indices. This ratio, by comparing the volume of traded put options to call options, provides a glimpse into the collective investor psychology, revealing whether the market is leaning towards bullishness or bearishness.

What is the Puts vs Calls Ratio?

Definition and Calculation

The puts vs calls ratio is calculated by dividing the number of traded put options by the number of traded call options. A put option is a contract that gives the owner the right, but not the obligation, to sell a stock at a predetermined price within a specific time frame. Conversely, a call option gives the owner the right to buy a stock under similar conditions.

Tools: Option Calculator

Formula: Puts vs Calls Ratio = Number of Puts / Number of Calls

Interpreting the Ratio

  • Above 1.0: Indicates that more puts are being bought than calls. This suggests that investors are expecting the market to decline, reflecting bearish sentiment.
  • Below 1.0: Implies more calls are being bought than puts, hinting at a bullish market expectation.
  • Equal to 1.0: Suggests a balanced market view among traders with equal expectations of upward and downward movements.

Significance of the Puts vs Calls Ratio in Market Analysis

The puts vs calls ratio is more than just a number; it’s a powerful indicator of market mood that can signal shifts before they happen.

Bearish and Bullish Indications

  • High Ratio (>1.0): A high ratio often predicts a bearish market. It might indicate that investors are hedging against a potential downturn or speculating on a decline.
  • Low Ratio (<1.0): Conversely, a low ratio typically signals bullish conditions, suggesting that traders are confident in future market gains.

Market Extremes and Contrarian Indicators

Smart investors watch the ratio closely for extremes. If the ratio reaches unusually high or low levels, it could indicate that the market is due for a reversal. Contrarian investors might use this data to look for buying opportunities in a seemingly over-pessimistic market or to sell when the market appears overly optimistic.

Practical Applications of the Puts vs Calls Ratio

To effectively use the puts vs calls ratio, investors integrate it with other technical tools and market data, ensuring a well-rounded approach to market analysis.

Hedging Strategies

Traders might use this ratio to determine when to hedge their portfolios. A rising ratio could be a prompt to hedge against a potential decrease in market values.

Timing Entries and Exits

The ratio can also help in timing market entries and exits. A sharply increasing ratio might suggest that it’s time to consider taking profits on a bullish position before the expected downturn.

Market Sentiment Analysis

Combining the puts vs calls ratio with other sentiment indicators like the VIX (volatility index), market breadth, and bull/bear polls provides a deeper insight into market psychology and potential movements.

Case Studies

Example 1: The Financial Crisis of 2008 During the 2008 financial crisis, the puts vs calls ratio spiked, as traders rushed to buy puts to hedge against further market declines. Those monitoring the ratio would have seen a clear signal of the increasing bearishness in the market.

Example 2: The Bull Market Rally of 2013 In contrast, during the strong bull market of 2013, the ratio was significantly lower, indicating predominant bullish sentiment as more traders were buying calls to profit from rising stocks.

Conclusion

The puts vs calls ratio is a nuanced tool that, when used correctly, can provide insightful glimpses into market sentiment and potential trends. Traders and investors who monitor this ratio can enhance their understanding of market dynamics, better manage their risk, and position their portfolios strategically in various market conditions.

Read: Puts vs Calls Explained

The post Understanding the Puts vs Calls Ratio: A Key Indicator for Market Sentiment appeared first on Investment U.

Why Aren’t More People Talking About MULN Stock?

At first glance, Mullen Automotive (Nasdaq: MULN) might seem like just another electric car startup. But, this EV maker has a pretty unique story that should make it incredibly interesting to stock market investors across the country. I’m honestly not sure why more people aren’t talking about it. That said, here’s everything you need to know about MULN stock – including whether or not you should buy it.

MULN Stock, a Quick History

Mullen Automotive is one of the least-talked-about, yet fascinating stock stories of the past few years. Mullen is a Southern California-based electric vehicle company that specializes in commercial trucks. But, what separates Mullen from a lot of other EV companies is its stock volatility. I say this because MULN stock was first listed at around $132,750 per share. Over the course of a few years, MULN stock has soared to a high of $362,925, before plummeting all the way down to just $4.55.

So, I know what you’re thinking – why would any long-term investor be interested in a company that’s this adept at value destruction. And the answer is: They wouldn’t be. I mean, Mullen Automotive lists these three risk factors at the beginning of its Form 10K:

  • We have incurred significant losses since inception, and we expect that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future
  • We will require substantial additional financing to effectuate our business plan
  • We have not yet manufactured or sold a significant number of vehicles to customers. Many of our products are still on the development stage and we may never be able to mass-produce them

Yeah, after reading that, I’m sure investors are just lining up with their checkbooks open. But, short-term traders might be interested in MULN stock for the volatility. After all, there are not many companies whose stock prices can surge this widely in price. To get a better idea of why MULN stock is so volatile, we have to talk about Mullen’s financing strategies.

Mullen’s Financing Strategy

On its Form 10K, Mullen reported just $366,000 in sales for 2023, based on invoicing for 35 total cars. At the same time, it reported $215 million in administrative expenses and over $700 million in financing expenses. In total, the EV startup lost roughly $1,006,658,828. So, what happened?

The team over at InvestorPlace did some digging into these numbers and discovered a few interesting takeaways:

  1. Mullen’s enormous financing costs mainly stemmed from the company’s convertible notes.
  2. Mullen issued $150 million worth of convertible notes in June 2022 in addition to other promissory notes.  
  3. The kicker is that Mullen allowed bondholders to convert their notes at the closing price of common stock while also issuing 1.85 bonus warrants for every share converted. The result was that Mullen Automotive spent $427.5 million to raise $150 million in fresh capital.
  4. Mullen used this same strategy a second time, raising $145 million but costing the company $255 million in warrant liabilities and almost $100 million in share issuances. 

Mullen is required to report these non-cash charges as “real” expenses – even though they mainly exist on paper. The real cost is for shareholders, who experience dilutions in the value of their shares. In other words, Mullen kept releasing new shares to raise more money, which made existing shares less valuable. InvestorPlace estimates that if you owned 1% of the company in 2023, your stake would have been diluted 98.7% by year-end to an ownership stake of just 0.0133%. 

I’m genuinely not sure why the company did this. I can’t imagine that it was an accident. So, I’d assume that the company’s management was just doing everything and everything to keep the lights on. But, at the same time, the company paid CEO David Michery $48,879,463 in stock awards, along with a salary of $750,000 in 2023. 

MULN Stock Price

Another issue plaguing Mullen Automotive is that its stock price keeps tanking. A company’s stock is essentially a way for it to raise money. If the stock price is soaring then so will the company’s valuation, which makes it easier to raise more money (by issuing more shares) or borrow money at attractive rates. For example, the GameStop Short Squeeze actually helped reinvigorate the company.

However, the reverse happens when a company’s stock price is falling. A lower market valuation makes it harder for the company to attract investors or borrow money. The stock can even be delisted from exchanges if the stock price falls below a certain level.  It’s a bit of a doom spiral downward.

Should You Buy MULN Stock?

As mentioned, almost no rational investor would want to buy Mullen Automotive stock for the long term. This is mainly because the company has a proven history of diluting its stock price and destroying its value. But, the company’s stock price experiences crazy fluctuations, which means there may be some opportunity for traders.

Mullen Automotive’s stock is inherently volatile because it’s such a small company. It currently has a market cap of just under $30 million and an average volume of 740,000. In other words, the company is fairly cheap and there are not a lot of shares trading hands each day. This creates the opportunity for massive swings in the value of shares. 

It’s fairly common for share prices of smaller companies to swing 20%, 30%, or even more in a single day. But, these types of price swings almost never happen for bigger companies. For example, companies like Boeing (NYSE: BA) or McDonald’s (NYSE: MCD) would rarely ever move more than 10% or more in a single day. 

With this in mind, you may be able to take advantage of dramatic changes in Mullen’s stock price, assuming you have information on the company that other investors don’t. If you know something that others don’t, then there might be an opportunity to buy/sell shares before the market reacts to the news. To do this, I’d recommend following along closely with the company on social media. You can sometimes hear about major updates that take place at the company before they are picked up by news outlets. This gives you the opportunity to arbitrage the information and make the corresponding trade.

I hope that you’ve found this article valuable when it comes to learning about MULN stock and whether or not you should buy it. If you’re interested in reading more, please subscribe below to get alerted of new articles from InvestmentU. 

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational and educational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial advice as the author, Ted Stavetski, is not a financial advisor. 

The post Why Aren’t More People Talking About MULN Stock? appeared first on Investment U.

Read This Before Buying any Bitcoin ETF

In January 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) made it legal for financial companies to release exchange-traded funds (ETFs) that can track the price of bitcoin.

In this article, I’ll break down why you should avoid buying a Bitcoin ETF at all costs – as well as my thoughts on why BTC is set to rally.

3 Reasons Why You Should Never Buy a Bitcoin ETF

They Charge Unnecessary Fees

A Bitcoin ETF is essentially just a financial tool that tracks the spot price of Bitcoin while charging you a fee to do so. But…you can easily do this yourself by opening a crypto wallet and buying Bitcoin. So, why would you pay another company to do it for you?

According to Nerdwallet, most Bitcoin ETFs charge between 0.5% to 1.5%. Now, you might think that these financial institutions are using some sort of secret strategy when tracking Bitcoin’s price. Right? Like, maybe they have a special crypto wallet that uses ultra-safe encryption technology. Nope. According to Nerdwallet, most Bitcoin ETFs on the market use Coinbase (Nasdaq: COIN). Again, this is easily something that you could do yourself – for free.

I guess it’s true that some BTC ETFs invest in futures while others invest in Bitcoin mining stocks. So, buying a Bitcoin ETF for the sake of tracking all of the BTC mining stocks might make a bit of sense. But, if you’re solely interested in getting exposure to Bitcoin then it makes zero sense to buy an ETF.


Now, I know what you’re thinking. Some of these ETFs have really cool names, like the “Bitwise Bitcoin Strategy Optimum Roll ETF”: (NYSEARCA: BITC). With a name like that, this ETF must have a unique trading strategy that outperforms Bitcoin, right?

Wrong.

Bitcoin ETFs Underperform BTC

I checked the 6-month returns of Nerdwallet’s Top 10 Best ETFs and, guess what? All 10 of them have underperformed Bitcoin’s return over the same period.

I know this is a bit of a small sample size. After all, a 6-month window isn’t very long. There’s a chance that these funds will go on to outperform BTC over the next 1 year, 5 years, or 10 years. But, I doubt it. Over the past 6 months, most of these ETFs weren’t even close to mirroring BTC’s return. They have all underperformed BTC by 20-30% or even more in some cases.

So, again, you’re essentially paying a company a fee to underperform the return of Bitcoin. On top of that, buying a Bitcoin ETF goes against everything that Bitcoin stands for.

A Bitcoin ETF is Against Bitcoin’s Ethos

If you’re a fan of Bitcoin and the decentralized finance movement then you know that bitcoin is all about people regaining control over their money. Right now, money is controlled by the government, central banks, and consumer banks. 

  1. The government takes your money through taxation
  2. The central bank devalues your money through inflation
  3. Consumer banks determine what you can or can’t do with your money.

Whenever you want to do something with your money, one of these three entities is standing by to make your life difficult.

Didn’t pay enough taxes? Here’s the government ready to audit you and demand all of your financial information.

Saving money so that you can buy a home? Well, the Fed raised interest rates so now you can’t afford the mortgage.

Want to send money to a friend? The bank says you have to wait until Monday.

The main purpose of Bitcoin is to solve issues in our financial system and eliminate financial middlemen. In doing so, Bitcoin gives you more control over your finances. If you buy a Bitcoin ETF then you’re just perpetuating the system that already exists. Bitcoin might not be a perfect solution to all of the problems I listed above. But, it’s the best alternative we have if we want to regain control over our money.

That said, even though I’m opposed to buying a Bitcoin ETF, I still think buying Bitcoin is a great idea. Here’s why.

Bitcoin’s Pending Surge

TLDR: Trillions of dollars will soon be invested in BTC = prices goes up.

The SEC’s decision to allow Bitcoin ETFs has ushered in a new age for the cryptocurrency industry. With this new rule, Bitcoin is no longer a fringe asset that’s used by drug dealers to launder money. Instead, BTC is officially a legitimate financial product that’s certified and approved by the world’s biggest financial institutions. This is a massive context switch.

During its initial announcement, the SEC said that it approved 11 applications for BTC ETFs. Over the coming years, I’m sure that dozens more funds will enter the industry. This means that wealth advisors around the world are starting to advise their clients to buy Bitcoin and other crypto assets. This will trigger a massive influx of money into BTC.

Visual Capitalist estimates that there are 59.4m millionaires in the world. These people make up just 1.1% of the world’s population. But, they account for roughly 45.8% of the world’s wealth – which is approximately $210 trillion. The overwhelming majority of these millionaires do not manage their own wealth. When you think of the average millionaire, you conjure up images of:

  1. Trust fund kids whose family owns businesses, real estate, or similar assets
  2. Famous celebrities like actors, athletes, singers)
  3. High-paid professionals like doctors, lawyers, CEOs

Do you really think any of these personalities are sitting around managing their own wealth? Absolutely not.

Imagine The Rock balancing his portfolio each quarter. Or, America’s top brain surgeon buying shares of $VOO on Robinhood (Nasdaq: HOOD). Not happening. For the most part, wealthy millionaires have someone else manage their money. Usually, a family office or similar high-end wealth management service. I’m talking about the types of investment firms that require $50 million in assets just to schedule a meeting.

Over the coming years, these private family offices will start to recommend BTC ETFs to their clients. This will result in trillions of dollars of privately managed wealth pouring into Bitcoin – likely resulting in a massive spike in price. Even if just 1% of privately managed wealth is invented in Bitcoin, it will result in $2.1 trillion flowing into BTC over the coming years.

I feel especially strong about this, thanks to the great wealth transfer.

Will BTC Replace Gold?

I have a very strong conviction that Bitcoin will eventually replace gold as the world’s default “safe haven” investment. I say this because America is currently undergoing the greatest wealth transfer of all time

Over the next two decades, Baby Boomers will transfer $84 trillion to their kids (Mainly, Millennials and Gen Z). This means that many younger generations will suddenly find themselves responsible for investing the family fortune. And, they’ll likely show a stronger preference for Bitcoin and crypto than their parents did.

Most advisors recommend keeping between 5% to 10% of your portfolio in gold. These talking points have been repeated so often that few people dare to question them. However, I think this mentality will gradually start to change over time. After all, how many younger investors are really interested in buying gold? For the most part, they only do it because “it’s what you do.”

But, you can’t spend gold. It barely increases in price (compared to other assets). You can’t even really use it, outside of jewelry or fashion pieces. BTC, on the other hand, can be easily transferred, spent, sent to friends/family, and has proven to increase dramatically in value over time. For these reasons and more, I believe that BTC will eventually replace gold as the default “safe haven” investment.

Anyway, I hope that you’ve found this article valuable when it comes to learning why you should never buy a Bitcoin ETF. If you’re interested in reading more, please subscribe below to get alerted of new articles.

Disclaimer: This article is for general informational and educational purposes only. It should not be construed as financial advice as the author, Ted Stavetski, is not a financial advisor. 

The post Read This Before Buying any Bitcoin ETF appeared first on Investment U.

(TAAS) Transportation As A Service – The Future of Transportation

Transportation as a Service (TaaS) is rapidly growing and is considered by many to be the future of transportation. Through TaaS, car ownership rates will eventually decline. Instead of owning a car, people will be able to buy trips, miles or experiences without having to maintain their own vehicle.

What is TaaS – Transportation as a Service?

Not long ago, owning a car was a mark of adulthood. It was a sign of independence, as well as a way to get to and from work. Over the years, this situation has gradually started to change. Urban areas have grown, which has made public transportation more common. Thanks to carbon dioxide levels, mankind is now searching for ways to reduce our carbon footprint. TaaS is one potential solution.

TaaS is a new mindset. Instead of focusing on car ownership, TaaS involves renting vehicles and similar practices. For instance, Uber and Lyft are both examples of TaaS. Instead of having to own your own car, you can use a ridesharing app to hire a car when you need a ride.

TaaS is similiar to Mobility as a Service (MaaS). While TaaS may involve an app like Uber and a human driver right now, this will not always be the case. In just one to two years, Goldman Sachs expects the first semi-autonomous car to become commercially available.

TaaS is important because today’s cars spend most of their time parked. Across the globe, the typical vehicle is idle during 95% of the day. Connected cars and rideshares can get rid of this idle time. Instead of multiple people using their cars to commute to work each day, the same people could rent a car and forego car ownership.

What is TaaS Technology?

In many cities, TaaS vehicles will be available 24 hours a day. While the average person only uses their car about 4 percent of the time, a TaaS vehicle will typically be used for 10 times more minutes each day. TaaS will work like public transportation does today, but it will blend private transportation providers into a gateway like an app. Then, people can access the gateway whenever they need to reserve and pay for a ride.

If you drive 15,000 miles per year, you can expect to spend an average of $8,469 a year on your vehicle. You have to pay for car insurance, gas, maintenance costs and car payments. By switching to TaaS, you could save hundreds or thousands of dollars per year.

Other than saving money, many people choose TaaS to get more free time. If you do not have to drive on your commute, you can work on something else. Then, you can enjoy spending time with your family once you return home. During your commute, you can also spend time learning a language, reading a book or enjoying your favorite hobby. In 2018, the average American spent 225 hours commuting. To put this in perspective, it only takes 480 hours to learn Spanish. And It takes around 45 hours to drive from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific Ocean.

TaaS has already been adopted by a wide variety of companies. DoorDash, GrubHub, Amazon Prime Delivery and Postmates already deliver products to homes across the country. Through WaiveCar or Turo, you can even lease your personal vehicle or find a vehicle you can lease. Other car rentals like Getaround, Zipcar and aGo will let you rent a vehicle whenever you need it. Meanwhile, Ridesharing, GoNanny, Uber, Zimride and Lyft offer rideshare services.

What Are the Consequences of Transportation as a Service?

The first car dealership in the United States was established in 1898. Since that time period, dealerships have followed a fairly basic business model. To prevent automobile manufacturers from competing with dealerships, many states required dealerships to serve as the middleman. Through TaaS and self-driving cars, this entire business model may change. Eventually, manufacturers may even sell vehicles directly to consumers.

If consumers purchase a vehicle at all, it will only be for a short period of time. While there are many ways that TaaS could be implemented, one option is for a self-driving car developer like Tesla or Google to own an entire fleet of self-driving cars. Then, the customer can pay per mile or minute. Because self-driving cars do not require a human driver, the cost of renting a vehicle will drop significantly.

Lower demand for vehicles means that there will be decreased demand for parking lots and garages as well. Normally, parking lots earn money by renting out parking spaces by the hour, day or month. If people pay for rides instead of owning cars, the need for parking lots would be almost eliminated.

Is TaaS a Good Investment?

Companies that sell self-driving cars are likely to perform well if TaaS leads the way forward. Other manufacturers may struggle because fewer people will be purchasing cars. Additionally, companies that run parking lots and garages will end up earning less. Eventually, many parking lots and garages in big cities may be sold and converted.

TaaS is conveniently built around four macro trends. Other than environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) investing, it incorporates connectivity, the gig economy and electric vehicles. Eventually, the TaaS industry will become an $8 trillion marketplace as it expands into areas like drone delivery, freight, distribution, food delivery and personal transport.

These trends are already taking place. As more people turn to TaaS options, car sales have fallen. Global vehicle sales dropped by 22% in 2020. Even without the pandemic, auto sales fell by 4% in 2019. This decline was the first time in a decade that vehicle sales dropped.

TaaS Could Be 10x Cheaper

According to some estimates, TaaS will be 10 times cheaper than traditional car ownership. Unlike traditional car ownership, you will not have to change the oil or look for a parking spot. Already, the market is responding to these changes. In 2009, Uber initially opened up. Within just seven years, Uber was already booking more rides than the entire American taxi industry.

The iGeneration has fueled the surge in TaaS usage. Back in 1983, more than 50% of teenagers had a driver’s license by the age of 16. In 2016, only 25 percent of teenagers had a license by the same age. These young people are using TaaS to hang out with friends, go to restaurants and visit their favorite shops.

Ultimately, the biggest takeaway is that investors and cities need to prepare now. As the transportation industry adapts and changes, everyone else will have to adjust as well. From fewer parking garages to reduced vehicle sales, TaaS is going to have a major impact on specific industries. While the overall impact of TaaS is going to be positive, there will be significant growing pains along the way.

Disrupters Reshape Industries

The following ideas come from Trends Expert Matthew Carr who has been closely following (TaaS) technology as a service and its broader impact.

Over the past couple of decades, we’ve witnessed disrupters completely reshape industries. Facebook (Nasdaq: FB) and Twitter (NYSE: TWTR) launched new ways for humans to communicate and interact. Social media is now one of the most powerful advertising platforms in the world.

The streaming service Netflix (Nasdaq: NFLX) not only created a model that dozens of other companies now emulate but also produces some of the best content out there. The studio receives scores of Oscar, Golden Globe and Emmy nominations and awards each year.

E-commerce giants Alibaba (NYSE: BABA) and Amazon (Nasdaq: AMZN) are the templates that the whole retail industry looks to replicate. Tesla (Nasdaq: TSLA) is pulling the entire automotive industry toward mass electric vehicle adoption.

In real estate, there’s Opendoor Technologies (Nasdaq: OPEN) and Zillow Group (Nasdaq: Z). And in finance, there’s Bitcoin and the defi movement. Not to mention the potential for blockchain. The list goes on and on. Many early investors in each of these disrupters have been rewarded with life-changing returns.

What are the TaaS Stocks?

Now, in TaaS, Uber (NYSE: UBER) and Lyft (Nasdaq: LYFT) have flipped the ride-hailing industry on its head. In fact, long-coveted taxi medallions in New York and other cities have plummeted in value. And these two stand to benefit in the continued expansion of TaaS over the next couple decades.

But these companies are far from equals. Lyft posted annual revenue in 2021 of $3.2 billion and is projected to leap more than 41% to $4.33 billion in 2022.

Uber – thanks to Uber Eats and its recent acquisition of Drizly – posted revenue of $17.4 billion in 2021 and is projected to see 2022 revenue jump 28% to $22.32 billion.

And in the American ride sharing market, Uber is the more dominant force. It currently controls 68% of the market, while Lyft holds the rest.

taas rideshare monthly sales

But what’s amazing is, that very few consumers use both. This is an interesting data point. You see, many Americans rely on subscriptions to Netflix, Hulu, Disney+ and Amazon Prime Video. Though, when it comes to ride-sharing, only 10% of consumers use both Uber and Lyft.

Latest TaaS Technology Companies to Watch

But there’s a new disrupter about to go public. Joby Aviation (NYSE: JOBY) is hoping to bring some of this sci-fi magic to millions of commuters. Over the past 10 years, the company has developed a zero-emission, all-electric, vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft designed to leapfrog traffic congestion.

Each aircraft will carry one pilot and four passengers for journeys of anywhere from 5 to 150 miles at a top speed of 200 mph. These are the taxis of the future. The next evolution in ride-hailing after Uber and Lyft. In fact, Uber was working on this idea but sold its segment to Joby in December. And it agreed to make a $75 million investment in the company.

Joby’s eVTOL taxi concept received a $394 million investment from Toyota (NYSE: TM) as well. The company’s goal is to save 1 billion people an hour of commute time each day and to accomplish this in an environmentally friendly way.

Joby plans to have commercial passenger aircraft in operation as early as 2024. And once these are up and running, its business should, literally, take off.

taas joby aviation projections

Revenue Forecasts

The company forecasts it will make $721 million in revenue by 2025. And it projects that number will more than double by 2026. By then, the company believes each aircraft will generate $2.2 million in annual revenue with roughly 850 plans in service.

Over the next decade, Joby plans to have a total of roughly 14,000 vehicles generating $20 billion in revenue. It expects to have a presence in at least 20 cities worldwide, with recurring revenue from its aircraft segment accounting for more than 50% of annual sales.

These are lofty forecasts. But Joby is further ahead than its competitors are. Joby went public through a merger with the special purpose acquisition company (SPAC) Reinvent Technology Partners (NYSE: RTP).

This deal valued the company at $6.6 billion. That seems steep considering there is no real revenue yet. But the opportunity for the air mobility market is upward of $500 billion in the U.S. Globally, this opportunity is forecast to top $1 trillion.

TaaS is not only the future of transportation, it’s one of the most dominant forces in the market right now. But over the next couple of years, it’s going to evolve rapidly and you could get in on the ground floor.

Stay tuned for the latest investing news on TaaS and other emerging technologies.

The post (TAAS) Transportation As A Service – The Future of Transportation appeared first on Investment U.